MEDICAL tourism in Malaysia is forecast to grow.
More and more foreigners are flocking here to seek a variety of treatments
across the cost spectrum. By all accounts, the country is an attractive
destination for medical tourists.
The
availability of competent medical personnel and high quality facilities will
continue to give Malaysia the edge over competitors. Indeed, the country generated RM588.6 million
in healthcare travel revenue from January to September last year, according to
the National Transformation Programme (NTP) annual report.
The biggest
market was Indonesia, making up 62 per cent of the healthcare revenue, followed
by the Middle East (7. 4 per cent), India (three per cent), China (2.6 per
cent), Japan (2.6 per cent), Australia and New Zealand (2.5 per cent) and the
United Kingdom (2.5 per cent).
It makes
sense for Malaysia to seize the opportunity to brand and position itself as a
provider of affordable, quality healthcare.
Still,
the enthusiasm for bringing in cash from afar must be tempered with realism.
And, the reality is many Malaysians, especially those in the rural areas, lack
access to quality healthcare.
As
Federation of Private Medical Practitioners’ Associations Malaysia president Dr
Steven Chow suggests, the government must “allocate more budget for healthcare
and stamp out leakages to ensure that the money is well spent”.
There is
nothing wrong with hospitals treating patients from other countries. If it
enables them to earn extra money, what’s the harm? But, Malaysians should not
be deprived of treatment, and this is the crux of the issue. We must give
priority to healthcare for citizens over medical tourism.
The
government has done a great job developing the healthcare system since 1957.
According to the Health Ministry, the incidence of those becoming poor because
of healthcare spending is low, and comparable to mid-level Organisation for
Economic Cooperation and Development countries such as Hungary, Sweden and
Denmark.
This is
because of the highly-subsidised public healthcare system, which does not even
recover the actual cost care delivery from users. The ministry recovers less
than three per cent of actual expenditure through various fees collected for
patient care and other fees such as rental of staff quarters and hostels, and
licensing fees.
Yet,
within this highly-subsidised public facility structure there are those who do
not or cannot pay their fees. Those who cannot pay are referred to medical
social officers for assessment of fee waiver and assistance from the health
fund.
There are
also Malaysians who do not settle their bills, regardless of their
socio-economic circumstances.
But, the
bulk of defaulters are foreigners, many of whom could have entered the country
specifically to access the public healthcare system.
These
limitations notwithstanding, the ministry must brace itself for the challenges
of an expanding ageing population, high prevalence of non-communicable
diseases, increasing and expensive medical technology as well as unexpected
environmental and communicable threats to health — all the more reason for
ensuring the well-being of all Malaysians and not solely for profit-making.